Progression of haemophilic arthropathy in children: a Lithuanian--Danish comparative study.

Recurrent bleeding into joints initiates a sequence of events leading to a progressive joint damage in people with severe haemophilia. This is a continuous process during childhood and adolescence, therefore joint abnormalities may be minimal on physical examination in very young children - even those receiving on-demand treatment. The aim of our study was to quantify the burden of arthropathy in Lithuanian patients who had been treated exclusively by on-demand substitution and compare their physical joint health with age-matched Danish patients who received prophylaxis from an early age. Boys, aged 4-17 years, with severe haemophilia and no signs of inhibitors were included in the study. Joint outcome based on the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was analysed in two different treatment groups and compared within the matched pairs. In total, 32 (16 in each treatment group) patients were enroled. A total of 192 joints were evaluated. Joint status according to treatment strategy was strikingly different: 27.4 for on-demand vs. 3.3 for prophylaxis (<0.001) group. Significance of the difference in joint status comparing different treatment strategies was equally strong both in younger (4-9 years) and older (10-17 years) patient groups: 2.2 vs. 12.5 (P = 0.0002) and 3.9 vs. 36.3 (P < 0.0001) respectively. The results further demonstrate the unequivocal effect of prophylaxis on joint status and give an insight into early and late manifestations of joint impairment based on the HJHS in haemophilia patients with treatment on-demand compared with joint changes that may develop over the time with the preventative treatment.

Utility of the Haemophilia Joint Health Score in study of episodically treated boys with severe haemophilia A and B in Lithuania.

Musculoskeletal outcome remains the major hallmark of haemophilia. The purpose of the study was to assess joint status using a new musculoskeletal assessment tool in children with haemophilia and describe the development of haemophilic arthropathy during childhood and puberty focussing on the age of remarkable changes. The prospective study involved Lithuanian patients aged 4-17 years with severe haemophilia A and B, no signs of inhibitors and treatment on-demand. Patients were subdivided into two groups according to actual age. Group I patients were 4-9 years and group II patients 10-17 years of age. The musculoskeletal status was measured using the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). We report on 20 patients with a mean age of 11.5 years (SD 4.3, range 4-17.2 years). The mean HJHS score was 24.5 (SD 14.5, range 5-50). The most affected joints were ankles, followed by knees and elbows. Mean HJHS score in age group I (n = 7) was 11.6 (SD 6.5); in group II (n = 13) the score was significantly higher - mean 31.5 (SD 12.8) (P = 0.0002). Ankles, knees and elbows were significantly more impaired based on the HJHS scores in older patients as compared with younger ones. The HJHS appears to be a useful tool in evaluating musculoskeletal outcome of patients receiving treatment on-demand. Children > or =10 years of age had significantly higher HJHS scores as a sign of progressing haemophilic arthropathy. We conclude that the most aggravating development of haemophilic joint damage seems to occur from the age of 10 and onwards.